Abstract

Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3

Author(s): Zur Eyal

Issue: Sep/Oct 2019 - Volume 23, Number 5

Page(s): 366-375

Download in electronic PDF format for $75
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 1
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 2
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 3
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 4
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 5
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 6
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 7
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 8
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 9
  • Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Israel, Part 3 Page 10

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is the most common form of leishmaniasis with global incidence of about 1.5 million cases annually. The disease is endemic in Israel and caused by two types, leishmania major and leishmania tropica. The two types of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Israel are not life threatening, but the multiple skin lesions developed from the contaminated sandfly bites cause significant damage to the quality of life for a few months in patients with leishmania major and sometimes for more than a year in patients with leishmania tropica. Topical treatment for this localized skin disease is very attractive although only one medication is registered in Israel (15% paromomycin +12% methylbenzethonium chloride ointment) for the topical treatment of leishmania major. Two significant disadvantages characterize this topical medication, 1) relatively low efficacy and 2) significant irritation and pain. This article represents part 3 of a 3-part article on the topic of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Part 1 discussed the treatment option of amphotericin-B liposomal gel, part 2 discussed the treatment option of paromomycin sulfate liposomal gel, and this final part (3) discusses the treatment option of photodynamic therapy.

Related Keywords

Related Categories

Printer-Friendly Version

Related Articles from IJPC

Issue/Page
View/Buy
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase)
Sep/Oct 2019
Pg. 366-375
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Jul/Aug 2019
Pg. 288-293
Author(s): Zur Eyal
May/Jun 2019
Pg. 200-207
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Jul/Aug 2003
Pg. 266-270
Author(s): Kuntz Rachael
Jul/Aug 2004
Pg. 269-274
Sep/Oct 2015
Pg. 357-365
May/Jun 2009
Pg. 262-263
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Nov/Dec 2018
Pg. 446-454
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Jul/Aug 2003
Pg. 288-291
Author(s): Glasnapp Andrew
Jul/Aug 1999
Pg. 309-310
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2011
Pg. 458-463
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Jan/Feb 2019
Pg. 23-31
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Nov/Dec 2018
Pg. 516-526
Sep/Oct 2004
Pg. 354-357
Mar/Apr 2019
Pg. 94-104
Author(s): Zur Eyal
Nov/Dec 2022
Pg. 480-488
Author(s): Riepl Mike
May/Jun 2003
Pg. 176-178
Author(s): Israel Alan
Sep/Oct 2022
Pg. 423
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Sep/Oct 2015
Pg. 410
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
May/Jun 2015
Pg. 243
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr