Abstract

Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies

Author(s): Polonini Hudson, Dijkers Eli CF, Ferreira Anderson O, da Silva Sharlene L, Araújo Paulo Victor C, Koulouridas Savvas

Issue: Sep/Oct 2020 - Volume 24, Number 5

Page(s): 426-433

Download in electronic PDF format for $75
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 1
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 2
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 3
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 4
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 5
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 6
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 7
  • Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies Page 8

Abstract

Compounded medicinal products should be prepared using an appropriate quality-assurance system. Cleaning and disinfection, as part of this system, are important to avoid cross-contamination of the preparations, reduce the bioburden levels in products, and avoid hazardous drugs residues or toxic chemical exposure of the staff workers. However, manual cleaning is difficult to standardize. Automated robotic cleaning devices are currently available and designed for domestic use only. To fill this gap, a laboratory automated robotic cleaning device (RVC1, FagronLab, The Netherlands) was specially developed to clean and sanitize laboratories of compounding pharmacies and other production facilities of primary healthcare establishments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an automated robotic cleaning device (robotic vacuum cleaner) for compounding pharmacies and other production facilities of primary healthcare establishments. A set of 6 experiments was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the cleaning procedure using the automated robotic cleaning device. All experiments were conducted at the end of a regular daily routine in the laboratory to simulate a genuine cleaning procedure. Tests were performed both with no forced contamination (to imitate the regular use of the device) and with forced contamination (to mimic unexpected, non-regular contamination, such as in the case of accidents). Total aerobic microbial count and the total combined yeasts and molds count were determined, as well as pathogens identification and the concentration of thiamine hydrochloride and progesterone active pharmaceutical ingredients (deliberately spread on the floor surface for the tests). In real-conditions, both two-step and single-step were adequate to clean the areas and reduce microbiological contamination to non-detected levels, and only the cleaning cycle without the mopping accessory was also suitable (in the two-step cleaning). The same can be seen for the forced-contamination condition, except for the use of the cleaning cycle without the mopping. In terms of chemical contamination, both high and low water-soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients were reduced (completely and 932-fold, respectively) in the single-step cleaning. The RVC1 automated robotic cleaning device showed the necessary microbiological and chemical efficacy to be used in the cleaning routine of compounding pharmacies, both in a singlestep cleaning (brushing, ultraviolet light, and mopping simultaneously) or in a double-step cleaning (brushing and ultraviolet light first, mopping second). It is then recommended to always use the mopping accessory and the ultraviolet light on. The RVC1 can be a valuable add-on method to standardize cleaning.

Related Keywords

Related Categories

Printer-Friendly Version

Related Articles from IJPC

Issue/Page
View/Buy
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase)
Sep/Oct 2020
Pg. 426-433
Sep/Oct 2003
Pg. 370-371
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Mar/Apr 2006
Pg. 113-119
Author(s): Jeffrey Megan
Jul/Aug 2012
Pg. 312-320
Sep/Oct 2012
Pg. 396-403
Mar/Apr 2000
Pg. 144
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Jan/Feb 2015
Pg. 30-37
Nov/Dec 2004
Pg. 452-456
Author(s): Rossington Karen
Sep/Oct 2012
Pg. 405-414
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2015
Pg. 453-463
Author(s): Timko Robert J
Jan/Feb 2007
Pg. 66-67
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2003
Pg. 458-459
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2002
Pg. 466-467
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Sep/Oct 2020
Pg. 356
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Mar/Apr 2015
Pg. 121-124
Author(s): Akers Michael J
Nov/Dec 2023
Pg. 503-511
Nov/Dec 2007
Pg. 502-503
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
May/Jun 2017
Pg. 193-203
Author(s): Mixon William, Roth Abby
Jul/Aug 2015
Pg. 268-278
Sep/Oct 2005
Pg. 382-383
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr