Abstract

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques

Author(s): Bjornstad Matthew, Kosinski Tracy, Burlage Robert

Issue: Sep/Oct 2020 - Volume 24, Number 5

Page(s): 434-438

Download in electronic PDF format for $75
  • Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques Page 1
  • Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques Page 2
  • Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques Page 3
  • Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques Page 4
  • Evaluation of the Efficacy and Superiority of Different Vial Rubber Closure Disinfection Techniques Page 5

Abstract

Contamination of sterile products has caused significant adverse outcomes in patients, including death. Limited research has been conducted on the efficacy and/or superiority of sterile isopropyl alcohol disinfection techniques of rubber stopper surfaces in sterile compounding. The objective of this evaluation was to investigate the efficacy and/or superiority between the following three disinfecting techniques of vial rubber tops when utilizing sterile isopropyl alcohol wipes: Intervention 1) three swipes back and forth using the same surface; Intervention 2) three swipes in a unidirectional manner using the same surface; Intervention 3) three swipes in a unidirectional manner using a different side of wipe with each swipe. The rubber stopper surfaces of 90 vials were contaminated with bacteria. Thirty vials were disinfected with each assigned technique, swabbed after drying, and plated. After plates were incubated for 48 hours, colonies were quantified, and the different techniques compared. When comparing the varying disinfection techniques to the positive control, Intervention 1 and Intervention 3 techniques showed statistical significance (P=0.00). The Intervention 2 technique showed no difference in colony counts from the positive control (P=0.259). Comparing the different techniques side by side, both Intervention 1 and Intervention 3 techniques were statistically different from the Intervention 2 technique (P=0.027, P=0.00). There was no statistical significance noted between the Intervention 1 and Intervention 3 disinfecting techniques (P=0.141). Disinfecting vials with three swipes in one direction with a different surface of the sterile alcohol wipe or disinfecting vials with a back and forth motion three times is superior to either not disinfecting the vial or disinfecting the vial with three swipes in one direction using the same surface of the sterile alcohol wipe during sterile compounding. 

Related Keywords

Related Categories

Printer-Friendly Version

Related Articles from IJPC

Issue/Page
View/Buy
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase)
Sep/Oct 2020
Pg. 434-438
Jul/Aug 2016
Pg. 283-292
Jul/Aug 2021
Pg. 298-302
Sep/Oct 2021
Pg. 403-408
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Mar/Apr 2023
Pg. 154-159
Nov/Dec 2022
Pg. 497-504
Author(s): Summers Amy
Sep/Oct 2003
Pg. 364-365
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Jul/Aug 2014
Pg. 270-276
Mar/Apr 2017
Pg. 133-142
Author(s): Akers Michael J
Nov/Dec 2019
Pg. 454-461
Sep/Oct 2021
Pg. 389-395
Nov/Dec 2021
Pg. 491-496
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Jul/Aug 2015
Pg. 268-278
Jul/Aug 2021
Pg. 311-317
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Sep/Oct 2022
Pg. 411-418
Author(s): Summers Amy
Mar/Apr 1997
Pg. 118-120
View Sample
Nov/Dec 2007
Pg. 502-503
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
May/Jun 2008
Pg. 252-257
Sep/Oct 2022
Pg. 432-435
Nov/Dec 2015
Pg. 491-500
Author(s): Akers Michael J