Abstract
Development of Stable and Simple Finasteride 333-μg/mL Suspensions that Minimize Occupational Exposure
Author(s): Ma Nathan, Perks William, Law Shirley, Iazzetta John, Walker Scott
Issue: Nov/Dec 2020 - Volume 24, Number 6
Page(s): 519-527
Abstract
Finasteride is not commercially available in a liquid format, which stimulated the development of a stable and simple finasteride suspension formulation. The objectives of this work were to develop and test a finasteride suspension for 1) simplicity to compound, 2) pharmaceutical acceptability, 3) stability, and 4) potential for occupational exposure. The stability of commercial 5-mg finasteride tablets (50 mg/150 mL) was evaluated in water, Oral Mix, and OralMix SF in amber polyethylene terephthalate bottles at 25°C or 4°C. Additional stability studies were carried out using sugar-free Finasteride Powder USP in amber polyethylene terephthalate bottles and tablets in water in polypropylene oral syringes. On study days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 38, 49, 63, and 90, the finasteride concentration was determined using a validated stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method. The potential occupational airborne exposure was evaluated by attempting to measure finasteride in 1000 liters of room air following shaking and nebulization. Finasteride suspension/dispersion formulations were prepared in water, Oral Mix, and Oral Mix SF from tablets and pure powder. All formulations retained more than 94.3% of the initial finasteride concentration, with 95% confidence, when stored for up to 90 days at room temperature or 4°C. Simulations of occupational exposure failed to demonstrate the presence of finasteride in room air following attempts to nebulize finasteride mixtures. We conclude that 333-µg/mL suspension/dispersions of finasteride in water or Oral Mix products will have more than 94.3% of the initial finasteride concentration remaining after 90 days, regardless of the formulation, container, or storage temperature. Although we could not detect finasteride in room air, given the analytical limits of the study, we estimate that exposure would unlikely exceed 3.6-µg/1000 liters of room air. Nevertheless, since current regulations are based on “no safe limit,” use of primary engineering controls and personal protective equipment as appropriate is recommended.
Related Keywords
- finasteride
- oral suspension
- hazardous drug
- occupational exposure
- workplace safety
- stability
- vaporization
- aerosolization
- dispersion
- nebulization
Related Categories
- ENVIRONMENTAL
- STABILITIES, COMPATIBILITIES
- DOSAGE FORMS/DRUG CARRIERS
- PROFESSIONAL ISSUES
Related Articles from IJPC
Issue/Page View/Buy |
Title/Author (Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase) |
---|---|
Nov/Dec 2020
Pg. 519-527
|
|
Jul/Aug 2020
Pg. 270-276
|
|
Sep/Oct 2021
Pg. 356
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
May/Jun 2019
Pg. 182-186
|
Author(s):
Dillon L Rad
|
May/Jun 2013
Pg. 182-190
|
Author(s):
Mixon Bill, Nain John
|
Nov/Dec 2020
Pg. 451-458
|
|
Nov/Dec 2006
Pg. 446-448
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Nov/Dec 2021
Pg. 515-522
|
|
Jan/Feb 2022
Pg. 72-79
|
|
Jan/Feb 2020
Pg. 30-36
|
Author(s):
Dillon L R
|
Mar/Apr 2007
Pg. 149-151
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
May/Jun 2003
Pg. 233-239
|
|
Jul/Aug 2000
Pg. 261-263
|
Author(s):
Lau Kellie
|
Nov/Dec 2019
Pg. 511-518
|
Author(s):
Hutson Chad, Day A J
|
Nov/Dec 1998
Pg. 414-415
|
Author(s):
Paoletti James E, Benavides Tomas J
|
Sep/Oct 2022
Pg. 358-362
|
Author(s):
Lopez C Vidal, Rios GL Quito
|
Jan/Feb 2009
Pg. 56-62
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr, Okeke Claudia C
|
Jan/Feb 2010
Pg. 14-18
|
Author(s):
Williams Angie, Mixon William
|
Jul/Aug 2018
Pg. 345-349
|
|
Sep/Oct 2020
Pg. 371-379
|