Evaluation of Closed-system Transfer Devices in Reducing Potential Risk for Surface Contamination Following Simulated Hazardous-drug Preparation and Compounding (Reprint)
Author(s): Soefje Scott, Rickabaugh Keith, Rajkumar Rahul, Wall Kathryn P
Issue: Jan/Feb 2022 - Volume 26, Number 1
View All Articles in Issue
Page(s): 72-79
Download in electronic PDF format for $75
Abstract: Closed-system transfer devices mitigate occupational exposure risks associated with hazardous-drug handling. This study was conducted in a controlled laboratory to evaluate the effectiveness of a needle-free and a needle-based closed-system transfer device in minimizing surface contamination during simulated compounding, preparation, and administration. A needle-based and a needle-free closed-system transfer device underwent three trials per system. Each trial included reconstituting cyclophosphamide in a vial, withdrawing cyclophosphamide from the vial, and pushing cyclophosphamide into an intravenous bag. After every trial, wipe samples were collected from five sources: biological safety cabinet workbench (left and right sides), biological safety cabinet grill, biological safety cabinet airfoil, and technicians’ gloves. Wipe samples were then analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with dual-mass spectrometry to measure cyclophosphamide concentrations. Surface contamination levels from 30 post-trial tests (15 per device) are reported, representing five different surface wipe samples from three trials for each device. Pre-trial samples of precleaned vials and work surfaces were obtained to ensure no cyclophosphamide contamination. Field blank samples were analyzed for quality-control purposes. Post-trial wipe sample analyses following each of the three needle- free trials did not detect cyclophosphamide on the biological safety cabinet workbench (both left/right), biological safety cabinet grill, biological safety cabinet airfoil, or the technician’s gloves. For the needle-based closed-system transfer device, the wipe sample analyses after the first trial showed no contamination; however, cyclophosphamide was detected on the right biological safety cabinet workbench at concentrations of 0.223 ng/cm2 and 0.021 ng/cm2, respectively, following the second and third trials. No cyclophosphamide was found on the technician’s gloves after any of the three needle- based closed-system transfer device trials. Based on surface contamination analyses, this study verified the ability of a needle-free closed-system transfer device in preventing the escape of cyclophosphamide during simulated compounding and preparation. Needle-free closed-system transfer devices warrant consideration for the handling of hazardous drugs.
Related Keywords:
closed-system drug transfer devices, surface contamination analysis, occupational exposures, work area surfaces, workplace exposure risk, needle-based system, needle-free system, hazardous drugs, cyclophosphamide, antineoplastic agents, cancer chemotherapy, workplace surface sampling, engineering controls
Related Categories:
ENVIRONMENTAL , PEER-REVIEWED, TECHNOLOGY, ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS, PROFESSIONAL ISSUES
Printer-Friendly Version
Related Articles from IJPC |
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase) |
Issue/Page
View/Buy |
Evaluation of Closed-system Transfer Devices in Reducing Potential Risk for Surface Contamination Following Simulated Hazardous-drug Preparation and Compounding (Reprint)
Soefje Scott, Rickabaugh Keith, Rajkumar Rahul, Wall Kathryn P
|
Jan/Feb 2022
Pg. 72-79
|
Evaluation of Closed-system Transfer Devices in Reducing Potential Risk for Surface Contamination Following Simulated Hazardous-drug Preparation and Compounding
Soefje Scott, Rickabaugh Keith, Rajkumar Rahul, Wall Kathryn P
|
Nov/Dec 2021
Pg. 515-522
|
Use of a Closed-system Drug Transfer Device (PhaSeal) and Impact on Preparation Time
Sanchez-Rubio Ferrandez J, Lozano M C, Iglesias I, Sanchez-Rubio Ferrandez L, Rodriguez Vargas B, Moreno Diaz R
|
Sep/Oct 2012
Pg. 431-433
|
Safe Cytotoxic Drug Preparation Using a Closed-system Transfer Device: Technical and Practical Evaluation of a New Device (Vialshield/Texium) Comparatively to a Reference One (Phaseal)
Garrigue Philippe, Montana Marc, Ventre Christophe, Savry Amadine, Gauthier-Villano Laurence, Pisano Pascale, Pourroy Bertrand
|
Mar/Apr 2016
Pg. 148-154
|
Hazardous Drug Enteral Device: A Closed System Device for Crushing and Dispersing Hazardous Drug Tablets for Enteral Administration
Lopez C Vidal, Rios GL Quito
|
Sep/Oct 2022
Pg. 358-362
|
Basics of Compounding for Hazardous Drugs, Part 2: Regulation and Sources of Contamination
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Nov/Dec 2006
Pg. 446-448
|
Agar Transfer Devices for Environmental Sampling in the Compounding Pharmacy: Science and Compliance
Grilli Anthony, Sutton Scott
|
Jan/Feb 2015
Pg. 30-37
|
How to Qualify Container Closure Systems for Intended Use, Part 1
Kim Amy A, Gehrmann Matthew R, McCaw James, McAndrew T Page
|
Nov/Dec 2019
Pg. 454-461
|
Extending Practical (In Use) Shelf Life of Oncology Drug Vials Using Spikes
de Wilde Sofieke, Crul Mirjam, Breukels Oscar
|
Mar/Apr 2023
Pg. 154-159
|
Quality Control: Personal Protective Equipment for Use When Handling Hazardous Drugs
Dillon L R
|
Jan/Feb 2020
Pg. 30-36
|
A Needle-free Reconstitution and Transfer System for Compounded Sterile Intravenous Drug Solutions: In Compliance with United States Pharmacopeia Chapter <797> Standards
Marks Zach
|
Mar/Apr 2014
Pg. 94-99
|
Comparison of Three Reconstitution Devices: A Simulated Time and Use Study
Penoyer Daleen, Giuliano Karen, Middleton Aurea
|
Mar/Apr 2023
Pg. 169-174
|
Antineoplastic Drug Contamination on the Outside of Prepared Infusion Bags
Breukels Oscar, van der Gronde Toon, Simons-Sanders Kathleen, Crul Mirjam
|
Jul/Aug 2018
Pg. 345-349
|
Quality Control: Testing for "Micromonsters": Viable Air and Surface Sampling in Aseptic Compounding
Mulder Kyle
|
May/Jun 2021
Pg. 211-216
|
Intravenous Needle-free Injection Devices: New Information for Compounding Pharmacists
Macklin Denise, Blackburn Paul L
|
Mar/Apr 2013
Pg. 100-110
|
The Drug Enforcement Agency's Position on "Constructive Transfer" Under the Controlled Substances Act
Pore R David
|
Nov/Dec 2012
Pg. 446-450
|
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Ramipril Entrapped in a Microsponge-based Drug-delivery System
Taghi Hassanien Sagban, Abdulbaqi Mustafa R, Samein Laith Hamza, Rahmani Maha H Philip
|
Jul/Aug 2023
Pg. 340-346
|
Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies
Polonini Hudson, Dijkers Eli CF, Ferreira Anderson O, da Silva Sharlene L, Araújo Paulo Victor C, Koulouridas Savvas
|
Sep/Oct 2020
Pg. 426-433
|
Sterile Basics of Compounding: Contamination Control Strategies, Part 2
Summers Amy
|
Nov/Dec 2022
Pg. 497-504
|
How to Develop and Maintain a Hazardous Drug List
Dillon L Rad
|
May/Jun 2019
Pg. 182-186
|
Return to Top |