Abstract
Single Center Experience with Robot Technologies for Sterile Compounding: A Retrospective Review
Author(s): Milibari Loay, Cotugno Michael, Belisle Caryn, Rocchio Megan, Patterson Robert F, Chacon Pablo, Fanikos John, Vo Peter
Issue: Jul/Aug 2020 - Volume 24, Number 4
Page(s): 346-351
Abstract
The compounding of sterile medication admixtures is a labor-intensive process and subject to potential human error. The addition of robotic devices and workflow technology may mitigate some of the challenges of compounding sterile product admixtures, especially for those associated with antineoplastic and hazardous medications. This article discusses the single-center experiences from October 2009 through August 2017 with various sterile compounding robotic technologies. The robotic devices included Intellifill i.v., Cytocare, i.v.Station, i.v.Station ONCO, and i.v.Soft Assist. The objective of this analysis was to describe the experience with robotic technology and workflow devices in compounding sterile medication admixtures. The number of prepared doses for each device was tracked, and each device had a tool to validate the dose accuracy via specific gravity measurement. Nonhazardous preparations with a dose variation of > (+/- 10%) were considered failures. For hazardous medications, variation of > (+/- 5%) was considered a failure. Doses that were prepared manually were also analyzed. The Intellifill i.v. robot was used to compound more than 1,000,000 admixtures (75% of all compounded products). The i.v.Station, Cytocare, i.v.Station ONCO, and i.v.Soft Assist robots compounded 14%, 7%, 3%, and 0.7% of the total chemotherapy doses required. Identified barriers to optimal performance included device (hardware) and software failures as well as shortages with specific fluid and drug containers. The qualitative analysis was done for 36 drugs that were prepared using i.v.Station and i.v.Station ONCO. The passing rate was estimated to be 95%. Barriers to use the device included lack of the appropriate medication container, diluent supplies issues, and software failure. Robotic devices and workflow technology for compounding sterile medication admixtures were unable to produce all routine parenteral doses required daily.
Related Keywords
- compounded sterile preparations
- drug admixtures
- robotic devices
- workflow technology
- hazardous drugs
- parenteral preparations
- sterile compounding
- compounding error prevention
- quality control
- academic medical center
- drug costs
- technical malfunctions
- device downtime
Related Categories
- PEER-REVIEWED
- STERILE PREPARATIONS
- TECHNOLOGY
Related Articles from IJPC
Issue/Page View/Buy |
Title/Author (Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase) |
---|---|
Jul/Aug 2020
Pg. 346-351
|
|
Jul/Aug 2001
Pg. 254-258
|
Author(s):
Rahe Hank
|
Mar/Apr 2004
Pg. 89-94
|
Author(s):
Rahe Hank
|
May/Jun 2004
Pg. 181-185
|
Author(s):
Hinkle Amanda R, Newton Gail D
|
May/Jun 2022
Pg. 219-228
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Mar/Apr 2021
Pg. 131-139
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Jan/Feb 2022
Pg. 41-49
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Sep/Oct 2023
Pg. 397-409
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Sep/Oct 2018
Pg. 387-398
|
Author(s):
Ashe Krystina, Baskett Dustin
|
Nov/Dec 2021
Pg. 491-496
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Jul/Aug 2023
Pg. 305-313
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Mar/Apr 2019
Pg. 123-130
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Jan/Feb 2011
Pg. 20-26
|
Author(s):
Robinson Marian
|
May/Jun 2023
Pg. 223-229
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Jan/Feb 2014
Pg. 6-12
|
|
Jul/Aug 2013
Pg. 307-311
|
Author(s):
McElhiney Linda F
|
Jan/Feb 2022
Pg. 10-17
|
|
Mar/Apr 2017
Pg. 133-142
|
Author(s):
Akers Michael J
|
May/Jun 2020
Pg. 215-220
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|
Jul/Aug 2021
Pg. 311-317
|
Author(s):
Allen Loyd V Jr
|