Abstract

Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility

Author(s): Carolina Souza de Barros Gomes Anna, Schettino Kegele Carolina, Taylor Sarah, Polonini Hudson

Issue: Sep/Oct 2026 - Volume 30, Number 5

Page(s): 463-481

Download in electronic PDF format for $75
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 1
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 2
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 3
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 4
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 5
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 6
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 7
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 8
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 9
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 10
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 11
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 12
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 13
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 14
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 15
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 16
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 17
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 18
  • Container–closure Performance of an Airless Calibrated Pump for Compounded Topical Semisolids: Dispensed-mass Reproducibility, Barrier Properties, and Compatibility Page 19

Abstract

Primary packaging can be a critical determinant of performance for semisolid drug products, particularly when the dose is delivered by a metered device. This study evaluated an airless, pouch-based metered-dose dispenser (Topi-pump™) as a container–closure and dose-delivery system for topical semisolids, focusing on (i) packaging quality attributes, (ii) delivered-dose reproducibility, and (iii) compatibility during in-use/accelerated conditions. Packaging performance was assessed by UV–Vis light transmission (opacity), aqueous extractables screening by UV–Vis, and particulate contamination testing. Dose delivery was benchmarked against two comparable calibrated airless dispensers by quantifying the dispensed mass of semisolid vehicles under predefined handling conditions (orientation and temperature) over 10 days. The schedule comprised 40 recorded actuations per dispenser and did not extend to container exhaustion, so terminal-dose behavior was not characterized. Dispensed mass was evaluated against a 0.5 g ± 5% criterion. Compatibility was examined using model semisolids containing representative steroidal drug substances, compounded in multiple cream bases, under accelerated storage conditions, supported by microbiological testing guided by USP <61>/<62> and acceptance criteria from USP <1111>. The dispenser met predefined packaging criteria, showing low extractables (0.0050 AU; limit =0.20 AU), low particulate burden (largest particle 67 µm; criterion =100 µm), and low light transmission (opacity 0.15%; criterion =1.0%). In the pooled screening across all vehicles and operating conditions, the Topi-pump™ dispenser showed a mean dispensed mass closest to the nominal target and the lowest overall variability by coefficient of variation (screening CV 9.5% vs 18.6–21.2% for comparators), although pooled interquartile ranges were comparable for Topi-pump™ and Pump A, suggesting that the difference reflected observations outside the central portion of the distributions rather than central dispersion. Condition-level conformity and precision were subsequently evaluated within Pentravan® as a single fixed reference matrix, with apparent viscosity considered as part of the formulation context.with apparent viscosity considered as part of the formulation context. In the preliminary vehicle-level screening, using combined data from all three dispensing systems and all evaluated temperature–orientation conditions, observed conformity was 61.4% for Pentravan®, 46.2% for Fitalite™ (Phytobase™), 39.4% for HRT Heavy™, and 7.7% for Salt Stable™ LS Advanced. These proportions pool three devices, three temperatures and three orientations against a ±5% band, and in the most viscous vehicle they reflect a systematic offset rather than erratic delivery: in Salt Stable™ LS Advanced (96.4 Pa·s at 20 °C), Topi-pump™ delivered a median of 0.450 g per actuation with a robust coefficient of variation of 6.7%, comparable to its precision in the other vehicles evaluated, and conformity in that matrix reached 98.1% against the 75–125% individual-dose interval applied in earlier work. Drug assay remained within 90–110% of the label claim throughout the study period, with TAMC/TYMC below the reporting limit (<10 CFU/g) and the specified pathogens absent. Across the tested conditions, the airless metered-dose pouch system met the predefined container–closure acceptance criteria. It showed the lowest conventional coefficient of variation in the pooled screening and low within-condition variability in the focused Pentravan® analysis, indicating suitable performance as a delivery platform for compounded topical semisolids under these conditions.

Related Keywords

Related Categories

Printer-Friendly Version

Related Articles from IJPC

Issue/Page
View/Buy
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase)
Sep/Oct 2026
Pg. 463-481
Jul/Aug 2004
Pg. 269-274
Jul/Aug 2021
Pg. 311-317
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2019
Pg. 454-461
Jan/Feb 2020
Pg. 14-19
Sep/Oct 2026
Pg. 483-499
May/Jun 2004
Pg. 181-185
Sep/Oct 2006
Pg. 353-358
Author(s): Shrewsbury Robert P
Jul/Aug 2014
Pg. 332-340
Nov/Dec 2003
Pg. 458-459
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Nov/Dec 2003
Pg. 477-480
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Jan/Feb 2003
Pg. 42-43
May/Jun 2004
Pg. 206-209
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
May/Jun 2016
Pg. 239-246
Mar/Apr 2017
Pg. 133-142
Author(s): Akers Michael J
Jul/Aug 2001
Pg. 254-258
Author(s): Rahe Hank
Nov/Dec 2012
Pg. 516-523
Sep/Oct 2021
Pg. 389-395
Jul/Aug 2015
Pg. 315-320
Author(s): Akers Michael J
Sep/Oct 2008
Pg. 414-418