Abstract

Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations

Author(s): Bryson Evan, Asbill Scott, Sweitzer Sarah

Issue: Nov/Dec 2014 - Volume 18, Number 6

Page(s): 504-511

Download in electronic PDF format for $75
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 1
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 2
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 3
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 4
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 5
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 6
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 7
  • Skin Penetration and Antinociception of Topical Gabapentin Formulations Page 8

Abstract

Chronic pain affects greater than 116 million Americans each year. Even with the best pain management approaches, many chronic pain patients still suffer from moderate to severe pain. An alternative therapy to treat chronic pain includes compounded topical formulations of common analgesics. Compounded dosage forms of gabapentin are commonly used for pain management, however, the penetration and efficacy of gabapentin in these compounded topical formulations has not been fully studied. In this study, the transdermal penetration of gabapentin was studied in Franz diffusion cells using porcine skin. Gabapentin was compounded in two commercially available bases; Lipobase, Lipoderm, and a standard poloxamer lecithin organogel. The penetration and retention of gabapentin in the skin was dependent upon the base. The most rapid and greatest penetration and retention of gabapentin in the skin occurred with a poloxamer lecithin organogel base. Lipobase and Lipoderm bases produced slow and smaller penetration and retention of gabapentin as compared to poloxamer lecithin organogel base. Gabapentin 1% and 5% compounded in Lipoderm were tested in the in vivo preclinical formalin pain model. Topical 5% gabapentin produced a similar reduction in nociception in both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the formalin response as systemic subcutaneous gabapentin (100 mg/kg). Topical 1% gabapentin reduced Phase 2, but not Phase 1 formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors. These findings suggest that topical administration of gabapentin may produce local antinociception.

Related Keywords

Related Categories

Printer-Friendly Version

Related Articles from IJPC

Issue/Page
View/Buy
Title/Author
(Click for Abstract / Details / Purchase)
Nov/Dec 2014
Pg. 504-511
Nov/Dec 2014
Pg. 512-515
Mar/Apr 2015
Pg. 161-166
Nov/Dec 2018
Pg. 498-503
Mar/Apr 2015
Pg. 167-173
May/Jun 2013
Pg. 247-253
Jul/Aug 2004
Pg. 269-274
Sep/Oct 2023
Pg. 424-430
May/Jun 2016
Pg. 250-256
Author(s): Trimble John, Light Bob
Nov/Dec 2009
Pg. 569-571
Mar/Apr 2003
Pg. 106-113
Author(s): Davidson Gigi S
Nov/Dec 2003
Pg. 460-463
View Sample
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr
Sep/Oct 2009
Pg. 386-389
Nov/Dec 2019
Pg. 496-503
Sep/Oct 2015
Pg. 357-365
Nov/Dec 2017
Pg. 530-535
Nov/Dec 1999
Pg. 496-500
Mar/Apr 2021
Pg. 146-155
May/Jun 2014
Pg. 256-261
Jul/Aug 2011
Pg. 308-315
Author(s): Allen Loyd V Jr